<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When the knives come out for Jam&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whereisab.co.uk/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whereisab.co.uk/blog/?p=333</link>
	<description>the digital home of andrew brown</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:52:45 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ab</title>
		<link>http://www.whereisab.co.uk/blog/?p=333&#038;cpage=1#comment-4956</link>
		<dc:creator>ab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 10:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whereisab.co.uk/blog/?p=333#comment-4956</guid>
		<description>Just on this issue Kenneth - it didn&#039;t just cost the UK tax payer - it cost the TV licence payer - which is a bit of a double edged sword in my mind. I have a sister that doesn&#039;t have a TV - therefore doesn&#039;t pay a licence. She does have broadband though, so should she have wished, she could have looked at the BBC resources - yet she didn&#039;t pay for them.

I on the other hand pay Sky for my television service. No pictures are received in my property by a conventional ariel, yet I still have to have a TV licence. It would be a really easy process for Sky to prevent my box from receiving BBC channels, or them handling the BBC &lt;strike&gt;tax&lt;/strike&gt; licence fee (as they did when they introduced a broadband service by paying BT the line rental costs).

If the choice was have my licence fee back, or have educational resources that anyone could use, then keep my money - I&#039;d rather be educated than rich.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just on this issue Kenneth &#8211; it didn&#8217;t just cost the UK tax payer &#8211; it cost the TV licence payer &#8211; which is a bit of a double edged sword in my mind. I have a sister that doesn&#8217;t have a TV &#8211; therefore doesn&#8217;t pay a licence. She does have broadband though, so should she have wished, she could have looked at the BBC resources &#8211; yet she didn&#8217;t pay for them.</p>
<p>I on the other hand pay Sky for my television service. No pictures are received in my property by a conventional ariel, yet I still have to have a TV licence. It would be a really easy process for Sky to prevent my box from receiving BBC channels, or them handling the BBC <strike>tax</strike> licence fee (as they did when they introduced a broadband service by paying BT the line rental costs).</p>
<p>If the choice was have my licence fee back, or have educational resources that anyone could use, then keep my money &#8211; I&#8217;d rather be educated than rich.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth McLaughlin</title>
		<link>http://www.whereisab.co.uk/blog/?p=333&#038;cpage=1#comment-4941</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth McLaughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 22:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whereisab.co.uk/blog/?p=333#comment-4941</guid>
		<description>Whilst I agree that this resource should stay in the public domain there is one issue I would like to comment on. BBC Jam is not a free resource it cost the UK tax payers over £150 million. As I tax payer I want it back!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whilst I agree that this resource should stay in the public domain there is one issue I would like to comment on. BBC Jam is not a free resource it cost the UK tax payers over £150 million. As I tax payer I want it back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marlyn.moffat &#187; I just get annoyed!</title>
		<link>http://www.whereisab.co.uk/blog/?p=333&#038;cpage=1#comment-4936</link>
		<dc:creator>marlyn.moffat &#187; I just get annoyed!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whereisab.co.uk/blog/?p=333#comment-4936</guid>
		<description>[...] Ministers North and South.  Got my links to do so from John Connel&#8217;s blog and got that from Andrew. I can&#8217;t help thinking that we have a commercialism versus progress thing with this. And [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ministers North and South.  Got my links to do so from John Connel&#8217;s blog and got that from Andrew. I can&#8217;t help thinking that we have a commercialism versus progress thing with this. And [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
