Apr 10

Today we had a meeting in Oban to look at our policy, protocol and training for schools to create websites.
We have run two entirely different courses for web creation over the past three years. Before I arrived in post, we ran a course showing people how to make simple websites using Textease Studio Plus. Although Textease is really designed for other things, as a by product you could save your files as html, thus creating simple sites that required a very low skill set to create – which I am always happy to see.
The problem with this method was that it had no functionality beyond simple hyperlinks. To move from this to create something more demanding required re-training in another application.
We decided to move to an application that would allow for this increased functionality, so we decided (after much discussion) to move to Dreamweaver. Why? It worked on both Apple Mac and MS Windows, and had the capacity to grow as people’s needs developed.
The only problem is that Dreamweaver is a very difficult interface to get used to.
We have had very little success getting our schools online with either Textease or Dreamweaver, so we had a meeting to look at how we could resolve this situation.
People will need to realise that it is time consuming to maintain a website. Also, schools need to get into the way of thinking that everything created in the classroom is potential web content.
Our solution is going to be threefold:
1. Run courses next session on blogging, podcasting and social bookmarking, instead of website creation. – this will give people the ability to get online, get an audience and begin significant communication.
2. The following session, run an initial course on ‘Planning a Website’ – bitter experience has shown us that people don’t know how to do this, so they need to examine it way before sitting down infront of a web editor. Schools need to know how to draw the structure of a website, collate electronic information, and optimise images
3. The offer a simple choice – A) Template: create a simple site using a provided template – this get the ‘uninterested’ or those that cannot devote the time/personnel online. B) Custom: create a site that is fully customisable in Dreamweaver. For those that want to put their own stamp on a website, or to create something that is different from the template, then they can go down this route.
I am still convinced that we need to teach kids how to create websites and not just to rely on the templates of web2.0 – without some skills, you don’t know how to alter or sort things? Also, in education we need to equip our students with the skills they need for the future – undoubtedly, many of our kids will go into the world of IT, and will need creation/management skills.
Is this progress? I hope so. I am much more interested and inspired by the technologies of web2.0 than web1.0 but still realise the importance of a site for schools – links from a school site to various blogs that are curricular projects seems like a great idea to me, and there is no doubt in my mind that the communication tools of web2.0 are far more valuable than a static html site. That said, a static html site allows the creator the ability to express themselves in a far greater way than any template driven blog can. To change the template, you need some programming skills.
What does anyone think?
Tweet This Post
Delicious