10 Comments »

Will Richardson doesn’t post as much has be used to, but when he does it really makes you sit up and take notice. He recently took part in a conference call with a senator. Here is a wee extract, but you can read all of what he had to say here:

Silence. I jump in (what the heck.) I’m a 21-year pub school educator and have been writing about this stuff for six years on my blog, I say. He says well you know more than I do about this stuff and chuckles. I say look, no real question here just two points. (My 90 second conference call pitch…been working on it.) First, in a world where we can learn anything, anywhere, anytime, we need every kid connected to the Internet. Second, we’re going to be throwing good money after bad on all this if we don’t start having a conversation about learning, not more content and skills. (It was a little better than that, I think.) Great points, he says. (A pattern is emerging.) Says the problem is that we’re not spending enough money on professional development (huh?) and that our teachers don’t know the technology.

This got me thinking – well, about a few things really.

1) those of us that blog about using technology in education at its benefits, blah, blah, blah – aren’t speaking to the right people.

2) here in Scotland we are about to have a national intranet in education ‘connecting everbody’ which is missing the two most vital components in my opinion – connectivity and hardware. Before anyone comments, I know this wasn’t part of the remit, but having the capacity is largely pointless, if, there are a huge number without the means to access it – all we highlight is the digital divide. And no, 15 minutes grabbed in the library at lunchtime is not the same as having your own machine wirelessly connected whenever (and wherever) you like.

3) For those of you that might get the opportunity for a ‘conference call’ with Jack McConnell or Hugh Henry, what would your 90 seconds pitch say?

I’ll start it off – free state provided wireless access anywhere, government sponsored affordable hardware, everyone being taught digital literacy and a ‘zero tollerance’ approach to indiscipline. This may be expensive, but I’m sure the ÂŁ15-20 billion on Trident could go a long way here.

And ‘Nik(unlike many in the world of ICT and blogging, I welcome any ‘anonymous’ comment), this one will probably get no comments either…

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Delicious Delicious

10 Responses to “What would your 90 seconds say?”
 

Oh yes it does: yay to scrapping Trident and buying the good stuff instead! Funny – I seem to have been saying that for the past 25 years. Ah well…..

chris wrote on March 15th, 2007 at 1:09 pm

 

Fully in agreement with the idea of every learner being connected. I’ve not even managed this yet in a school of 21 kids (I have almost one computer between two at present)and I’m doing quite well.

The thing that gets to me about Trident and its replacement is that it is a weapons system build to fight a type of war which doesn’t exist any more.

I watched a news interviewer ask Bianca Jagger – ‘Should we not have nuclear in case Al Qaeda get them.’

So where do we nuke? Present and future conflicts are with agressors without countries. We may as well invest in a new cavalry or perhaps in our children’s future instead.

Dick Edie wrote on March 15th, 2007 at 4:10 pm

 

Access for all- The handheld device to access it and the wireless carrier to connect to it.

Ian Stuart wrote on March 15th, 2007 at 5:13 pm

 

…tough one, but I’d be asking that ‘New’ literacy (is that Literacy2.0?) be a mandatory subject in schools starting in Primary 1. It is as important to the children of today as reading and writing were to me, and yet there is no set programme for learning the skills, or indeed for which skills they need to learn…

PS: I sense a meme in this one…

Neil Winton wrote on March 15th, 2007 at 5:43 pm

 

Hi Andrew,
No arguments with your arguments here. Always on, transparent tech.

Neil, I’d leave it till a few years after primary one myself (mind you I would not be teaching any kind of Literacy to wee ones until they had mastered some emotional literacy if i was emperor).

john wrote on March 15th, 2007 at 6:13 pm

 

I have had the chance to conference with Jack when he was Education Minister. He was in Inveraray and my Advanced Higher students demonstrated video conferencing with their counterparts in Tarbert – Jack’s aides were very concerned when they heard we were going to demonstrate in French, in case he couldn’t understand what was being said. Too many things I’d want to say to him if I ever got the chance to do it again to list I think!

Lynne wrote on March 15th, 2007 at 6:14 pm

 

Spot on, Andrew! I hope to make some comment on this too soon – your points here are pretty much where I will be pitching my own thoughts as well. Thanks for the step-up, so to speak!

John Connell wrote on March 15th, 2007 at 8:09 pm

 

Thanks all,

John J – when would you start teaching info lit? I find this whole concept fascinating.

Lynne – there are loads of other things I’d want to say too! That’s what makes the whole 90 second thing interesting. Ewan talks about this as his ‘elevator pitch’. If you only have 90 seconds, what are the most important things that you need to get across?

John C – done, and I look forward to reading your thoughts on this issue too!

ab wrote on March 16th, 2007 at 8:45 am

 

Hi Andrew,
Off the cuff I’d leave computers alone until 7/primary 3.
I know there are lots of brilliant pre-5 examples of ict so my cuff is probably very wrong.

i have the feeling that we might be starting to teach literacy earlier and earlier and i am not sure if it has a positive long term effect effect?

I recall talking to folk at Steiner school where they leave reading and writing until 7 or so (same as Germany I think) they felt that the children learn reading/writing faster at 7 and spent more time learning social skills before that.

I also remember seeing a study about pre 7 using ict that linked it to a decrease in creativity, no idea at all if the study was valid.

Very muddled thinking on my part;-)

john wrote on March 19th, 2007 at 9:16 pm

 

It depends what you mean by “teaching literacy”. I agree with the idea of leaving formal lit/num skills till 7, but so much can be done before that which prepares the ground and plants the seeds. Recently I watched a small group of pre 5s use images on an IWB with a very skilled Nursery Nurse. They were matching similar things I think. They were all involved, using language, motivated and engaged. They were learning about taking turns. Some were even co-operating with each other.
They weren’t learning about ICT as such. They were learning though. Using ICT.
Yes it could have been done a different way, and no doubt is on other occasions, but it was another way to reach the parts that …you get it. The crucial part of course was the input of the adult human being working with them.

Dorothy wrote on March 24th, 2007 at 1:35 pm

Leave a Reply