This number may mean nothing to you, but this was the number I received when sucked into a scam like so many others on twitter yesterday. It’s only now the lone voice of reason @jonesieboy comes into sharp focus as he couldn’t believe how many people had voluntarily typed their username and password into a website merely to find out a number that few (if any) knew the meaning of.
Fortunately for the gullible, it wasn’t truly a scam, but an experiment to find out the extent of the network in twitter – it’s easy to see your own @ replies, but just how far do these connections go? Thanks to @katiebarrowman for pointing out the truth behind the story to me. I think we’re all suitably shamed. If we’re not, then we should be.
Why did I do it? Well, quite simply, because others had. It brings the value of this network into sharp focus again for me. Here is a group of loosely related individuals that I have learned to trust for their advice or opinions. Now I know how gullible we all are, should I value this network as much?
It’s been a bit of a day full of numbers for me today. I’ve watched over the last few days the number of people in Learning & Teaching Scotland joining up to ‘Yammer‘ (a closed equivalent of twitter for those that share the same email address domain) reach roughly a quarter of the organisation. Is this a valuable tool? One of my colleagues noted that if we all actually answer the question posed by Yammer ‘What are you working on?’, then it would be worthwhile, as we’d all be much better informed as the workings of our colleagues. Will people do this though? I suspect we all value the opportunity for conversation too much to be ‘merely’ productive.
Which brings me back to twitter – I have only two contacts in twitter that only ever answer the question posed ‘What are you doing?’ – would it be a better network if that’s all we said? The problem is our nature – we just can’t resist clicking on a link from someone we trust, can we?

